Family Court of Western Australia

Please help me, my entire family got absolutely memed and now I am the only one remaining. Its like an apocalypse, they just take your family away for going INTO the court. Please help me, I was just using a free Robux generator.

ICL's do not act as independent for children, I believe they have conflicts of interest and some are a extreme left wing feminist, if you get an incompetent ICL id suggest contact legal aid request another, its a disgrace to the court IMO that an ICL can attack a father for basically nothing yet defend a mother with very serious and extreme problems. its unbelievable to watch

this is the most depressing place & the time it takes to get a decision is mind blowing 4.5 years so far & a simple case . lawyers love this place as its gold mine for them. The court actual time in court is also a joke as they spend max of 4 hours 45 minutes hours a day actual court time at trial. This place needs to be more efficient and needs a total overhaul

Judge Glass was fair and reasonable. Although the entire process took two years and we were sent to mediation three times because there was no reason to be in a courtroom besides the fact no one could agree. Finally, we had register Corrick who managed a 10hr mediation with professionalism and honesty. She set everyone's reality straight and had the kids best interest as her priority. I truly believe if we had of mediated with her originally it would never have been such a long process. We will be back in 18months to reassess but for now, the kids get quality time with both Mum and Dad as they deserve.

Independent expert witness lies and fills his report full of mistakes with incorrect referencing and false information , is 💯 biased and a scoundrel to say the least . Independent children's lawyer not much better . Seems you can write what you like in an affidavit with no evidence or any proof infact the exact opposite and the court will accept it, write an affidavit with the truth that can be proven and it's not accepted. False form 4s can be lodged and accepted but one based on truth and the actual going ons with evidence to support it will get rejected. Child's welfare put at risk over and over again and the court favours the biased DCP and the parent with the open case against them over the parent without one . Flawed system , second time going through the BS . Would have thought they learnt something the first time from the BS spawned from the manipulative party trying to control the situation and not lose custody rather than provide what was best for the child's welfare .